This article aims to analyse the International Court of Justice’s Order of 23 January 2020 on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by The Gambia against Myanmar under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The emblematic nature of this Order in regards to erga omnes partes obligations will be investigated firstly from a theoretical point of view, describing the concepts of jus cogens, erga omnes and erga omnes partes, followed by a summary of the International Court of Justice’s non-linear jurisprudence on obligations erga omnes. Additionally, the expansion of the right of non-injured States to invoke responsibility for erga omnes partes violations will be examined as a consequence of the 2020 Order and the Judgement of 2022. Finally, how the OIC, a non-state actor, can influence cases that involve community interests.
The standing of The Gambia under the Genocide Convention and the case on the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar)
Ano
2022
Escola
Direito Rio – Escola de Direito Rio de Janeiro
Aluno-pesquisador
Diana Lise Miranda Silva Vargas de Freitas
Orientador
Profª. Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida
Localidade
Rio de Janeiro