Uma Análise das Resoluções No. 259/2023 e No. 265/2023 CNMP no Combate à Discriminação de Gênero, Assédio Moral e Sexual no Ministério Público Brasileiro

Triggered by an incident of silenced sexual harassment within a Public Defender's Office, the study addresses a critical question: how does the National Council of the Public Prosecution Service (CNMP) formally regulate the combat against gender discrimination, moral and sexual harassment within the Brazilian Public Prosecution Service, and what is the operationalizable potential of this normative formulation to promote institutional restructuring effectively? Drawing upon a qualitative and documentary methodology, informed by the critical feminist theories of Sara Ahmed (2021) and Catharine MacKinnon (2002), this research critically analyzes CNMP Resolutions No. 259/2023 and No. 265/2023. These  resolutions are examined not as prescriptive guides, but as institutional designs whose formulation is assessed for its capacity to address deep-seated inequalities, anticipating potential challenges and institutional resistance. The study's  central hypothesis is that while these resolutions hold significant potential for combating discrimination and harassment, this potential is fundamentally challenged by a considerable gap between theory and practice, often exacerbated by institutional self-protection and the silencing of complaints, as highlighted by Ahmed. This work aims to contribute to the understanding of how normative frameworks function within large public organizations, arguing for the continuous critical engagement necessary to ensure that institutional commitments to equality transcend mere rhetoric and become verifiable internal practices